MIKIVERSE HEADLINE NEWS

Monday, June 7, 2010

U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe

By Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter June 6, 2010 9:31 pm
Federal officials have arrested an Army intelligence analyst who boasted of giving classified U.S. combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site Wikileaks, Wired.com has learned.

SPC Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Maryland, was stationed at Forward Operating Base Hammer, 40 miles east of Baghdad, where he was arrested nearly two weeks ago by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division. A family member says he’s being held in custody in Kuwait, and has not been formally charged.

Manning was turned in late last month by a former computer hacker with whom he spoke online. In the course of their chats, Manning took credit for leaking a headline-making video of a helicopter attack that Wikileaks posted online in April. The video showed a deadly 2007 U.S. helicopter air strike in Baghdad that claimed the lives of several innocent civilians.

He said he also leaked three other items to Wikileaks: a separate video showing the notorious 2009 Garani air strike in Afghanistan that Wikileaks has previously acknowledged is in its possession; a classified Army document evaluating Wikileaks as a security threat, which the site posted in March; and a previously unreported breach consisting of 260,000 classified U.S. diplomatic cables that Manning described as exposing “almost criminal political back dealings.”

“Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public,” Manning wrote.

Wired.com could not confirm whether Wikileaks received the supposed 260,000 classified embassy dispatches. To date, a single classified diplomatic cable has appeared on the site: released last February, it describes a U.S. embassy meeting with the government of Iceland. E-mail and a voice mail message left for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on Sunday were not answered by the time this article was published.

The State Department said it was not aware of the arrest or the allegedly leaked cables. The FBI was not prepared to comment when asked about Manning.

Army spokesman Gary Tallman was unaware of the investigation but said, “If you have a security clearance and wittingly or unwittingly provide classified info to anyone who doesn’t have security clearance or a need to know, you have violated security regulations and potentially the law.”

Manning’s arrest comes as Wikileaks has ratcheted up pressure against various governments over the years with embarrassing documents acquired through a global whistleblower network that is seemingly impervious to threats from adversaries. Its operations are hosted on servers in several countries, and it uses high-level encryption for its document submission process, providing secure anonymity for its sources and a safe haven from legal repercussions for itself. Since its launch in 2006, it has never outed a source through its own actions, either voluntarily or involuntarily.

Manning came to the attention of the FBI and Army investigators after he contacted former hacker Adrian Lamo late last month over instant messenger and e-mail. Lamo had just been the subject of a Wired.com article. Very quickly in his exchange with the ex-hacker, Manning claimed to be the Wikileaks video leaker.

“If you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do?” Manning asked.

Bradley Manning (Facebook.com)

From the chat logs provided by Lamo, and examined by Wired.com, it appears Manning sensed a kindred spirit in the ex-hacker. He discussed personal issues that got him into trouble with his superiors and left him socially isolated, and said he had been demoted and was headed for an early discharge from the Army.

When Manning told Lamo that he leaked a quarter-million classified embassy cables, Lamo contacted the Army, and then met with Army CID investigators and the FBI at a Starbucks near his house in Carmichael, California, where he passed the agents a copy of the chat logs. At their second meeting with Lamo on May 27, FBI agents from the Oakland Field Office told the hacker that Manning had been arrested the day before in Iraq by Army CID investigators.

Lamo has contributed funds to Wikileaks in the past, and says he agonized over the decision to expose Manning — he says he’s frequently contacted by hackers who want to talk about their adventures, and he’s never considered reporting anyone before. The supposed diplomatic cable leak, however, made him believe Manning’s actions were genuinely dangerous to U.S. national security.

“I wouldn’t have done this if lives weren’t in danger,” says Lamo, who discussed the details with Wired.com following Manning’s arrest. “He was in a war zone and basically trying to vacuum up as much classified information as he could, and just throwing it up into the air.”

Manning told Lamo that he enlisted in the Army in 2007 and held a Top Secret/SCI clearance, details confirmed by his friends and family members. He claimed to have been rummaging through classified military and government networks for more than a year and said that the networks contained “incredible things, awful things … that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC.”

He first contacted Wikileaks’ Julian Assange sometime around late November last year, he claimed, after Wikileaks posted 500,000 pager messages covering a 24-hour period surrounding the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. ”I immediately recognized that they were from an NSA database, and I felt comfortable enough to come forward,” he wrote to Lamo. He said his role with Wikileaks was “a source, not quite a volunteer.”

Manning had already been sifting through the classified networks for months when he discovered the Iraq video in late 2009, he said. The video, later released by Wikileaks under the title “Collateral Murder,” shows a 2007 Army helicopter attack on a group of men, some of whom were armed, that the soldiers believed were insurgents. The attack killed two Reuters employees and an unarmed Baghdad man who stumbled on the scene afterward and tried to rescue one of the wounded by pulling him into his van. The man’s two children were in the van and suffered serious injuries in the hail of gunfire.

“At first glance it was just a bunch of guys getting shot up by a helicopter,” Manning wrote of the video. “No big deal … about two dozen more where that came from, right? But something struck me as odd with the van thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officer’s directory. So I looked into it.”

In January, while on leave in the U.S., Manning visited a close friend in Boston and confessed he’d gotten his hands on unspecified sensitive information, and was weighing leaking it, according to the friend. “He wanted to do the right thing,” says 20-year-old Tyler Watkins. “That was something I think he was struggling with.”

Manning passed the video to Wikileaks in February, he told Lamo. After April 5 when the video was released and made headlines Manning contacted Watkins from Iraq asking him about the reaction in the U.S.

“He would message me, Are people talking about it?… Are the media saying anything?,” Watkins said. “That was one of his major concerns, that once he had done this, was it really going to make a difference?… He didn’t want to do this just to cause a stir. … He wanted people held accountable and wanted to see this didn’t happen again.”

Watkins doesn’t know what else Manning might have sent to Wikileaks. But in his chats with Lamo, Manning took credit for a number of other disclosures.

The second video he claimed to have leaked shows a May 2009 air strike near Garani village in Afghanistan that the local government says killed nearly 100 civilians, most of them children. The Pentagon released a report about the incident last year, but backed down from a plan to show video of the attack to reporters.

As described by Manning in his chats with Lamo, his purported leaking was made possible by lax security online and off.

Manning had access to two classified networks from two separate secured laptops: SIPRNET, the Secret-level network used by the Department of Defense and the State Department, and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System which serves both agencies at the Top Secret/SCI level.

The networks, he said, were both “air gapped” from unclassified networks, but the environment at the base made it easy to smuggle data out.

“I would come in with music on a CD-RW labeled with something like ‘Lady Gaga’, erase the music then write a compressed split file,” he wrote. “No one suspected a thing and, odds are, they never will.”

“[I] listened and lip-synced to Lady Gaga’s ‘Telephone’ while exfiltrating possibly the largest data spillage in American history,” he added later. ”Weak servers, weak logging, weak physical security, weak counter-intelligence, inattentive signal analysis… a perfect storm.”

Manning told Lamo that the Garani video was left accessible in a directory on a U.S. Central Command server, centcom.smil.mil, by officers who investigated the incident. The video, he said, was an encrypted AES-256 ZIP file.

Manning’s aunt, with whom he lived in the U.S., had heard nothing about his arrest when first contacted by Wired.com last week; Debra Van Alstyne said she last saw Manning during his leave in January and they had discussed his plans to enroll in college when his four-year stint in the Army was set to end in October 2011. She described him as smart and seemingly untroubled, with a natural talent for computers and a keen interest in global politics.

She said she became worried about her nephew recently after he disappeared from contact. Then Manning finally called Van Alstyne collect on Saturday. He told her that he was okay, but that he couldn’t discuss what was going on, Van Alstyne said. He then gave her his Facebook password and asked her to post a message on his behalf.

The message reads: “Some of you may have heard that I have been arrested for disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons. See CollateralMurder.com.”

Ex-hacker Adrian Lamo (Ariel Zambelich/Wired.com)

An Army defense attorney then phoned Van Alstyne on Sunday and said Manning is being held in protective custody in Kuwait. “He hasn’t seen the case file, but he does understand that it does have to do with that Collateral Murder video,” Van Alstyne said.

Manning’s father said Sunday that he’s shocked by his son’s arrest.

“I was in the military for 5 years,” said Brian Manning, of Oklahoma. “I had a Secret clearance, and I never divulged any information in 30 years since I got out about what I did. And Brad has always been very, very tight at adhering to the rules. Even talking to him after boot camp and stuff, he kept everything so close that he didn’t open up to anything.”

His son, he added, is “a good kid. Never been in trouble. Never been on
drugs, alcohol, nothing.”

Lamo says he felt he had no choice but to turn in Manning, but that he’s now concerned about the soldier’s status and well-being. The FBI hasn’t told Lamo what charges Manning may face, if any.

The agents did tell Lamo that he may be asked to testify against Manning. The Bureau was particularly interested in information that Manning gave Lamo about an apparently-classified military cybersecurity matter, Lamo said.

That seemed to be the least interesting information to Manning, however. What seemed to excite him most in his chats, was his supposed leaking of the embassy cables. He anticipated returning to the states after his early discharge, and watching from the sidelines as his action bared the secret history of U.S. diplomacy around the world.

“Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed,” Manning wrote. “It’s open diplomacy. World-wide anarchy in CSV format. It’s Climategate with a global scope, and breathtaking depth. It’s beautiful, and horrifying.”

Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/#ixzz0q8URPBwN

Passengers grabbed Israeli weapons to stop the killing


Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0--18 Years --- United States, 2008

Please note: An erratum has been published for this article. The erratum is located at the bottom of this article.

The recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0--18 years and the catch-up immunization schedule for 2008 have been approved by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians. The standard MMWR footnote format has been modified for publication of this schedule.

Suggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0--18 years---United States, 2008. MMWR 2007;56(51&52):Q1--Q4.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) annually publishes a recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0--18 years to reflect changes in vaccine formulations and current recommendations for the use of licensed vaccines. Changes to the previous schedule (1) are as follows:

  • The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) footnote reflects updated recommendations for incompletely vaccinated children aged 24--59 months, including those with underlying medical conditions (2).
  • Recommendations for use of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) now include healthy children aged as young as 2 years. LAIV should not be administered to children aged less than 5 years> 3). Children aged less than 9>4).
  • For meningococcal vaccines, changes affect certain children aged 2--10 years (5). Vaccinating with meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) is preferred to meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MPSV4) for children at increased risk for meningococcal disease, including children who are traveling to or residents of countries in which the disease is hyperendemic or epidemic, children who have terminal complement component deficiencies, and children who have anatomic or functional asplenia. The catch-up schedule for youths aged 13--18 years has been updated. MPSV4 is an acceptable alternative for short-term (i.e., 3--5 years) protection against meningococcal disease for persons aged 2--18 years (6).
  • The tetanus and diphtheria toxoids/tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Td/Tdap) catch-up schedule for persons aged 7--18 years who received their first dose before age 12 months now indicates that these youths should receive 4 doses, with at least 4 weeks (not 8 weeks) between doses 2 and 3.
  • The catch-up bars for hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine have been deleted on the routine schedule for persons aged 0--6 years (Figure 1). The figure title refers users to the catch-up schedule (Table) for patients who fall behind or start late with vaccinations.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act requires that health-care providers provide parents or patients with copies of Vaccine Information Statements before administering each dose of the vaccines listed in the schedule. Additional information is available from state health departments and from CDC at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/default.htm.

Detailed recommendations for using vaccines are available from package inserts, ACIP statements (available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm), and the 2006 Red Book (7). Guidance regarding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System form is available at http://www.vaers.hhs.gov or by telephone, 800-822-7967skype_highlighting +18008227967 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +18008227967      end_of_the_skype_highlighting end_of_the_skype_highlighting" class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common"> 800-822-7967 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

References

  1. CDC. Recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedule---United States. MMWR 2007;55(51&52):Q1--Q4.
  2. CDC. Revised recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the prevention of pneumococcal disease. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2007. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/acip/downloads/min_oct07.pdf
  3. CDC. Expansion of use of live attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist®) to children aged 2--4 years and other FluMist changes for the 2007--08 influenza season. MMWR 2007;56:1217--9.
  4. CDC. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2007;56(No. RR-6).
  5. CDC. Recommendation from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) in children aged 2--10 years at increased risk for invasive meningococcal disease. MMWR 2007;56:1265--6.
  6. CDC. Revised recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to vaccinate all persons aged 11--18 years with meningococcal conjugate vaccine. MMWR 2007;56:794--5.
  7. American Academy of Pediatrics. Active and passive immunization. In: Pickering LK, ed. 2006 red book: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 27th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2006.

FIGURE 1. Recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0--6 years --- United States, 2008 (for those who fall behind or start late, see the catch-up schedule [Table])


Figure 1
Return to top.

This schedule indicates the recommended ages for routine administration of currently licensed childhood vaccines, as of December 1, 2007, for children aged 0--6 years. Additional information is available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules. Any dose not administered at the recommended age should be administered at any subsequent visit, when indicated and feasible. Additional vaccines may be licensed and recommended during the year. Licensed combination vaccines may be used whenever any components of the combination are indicated and other components of the vaccine are not contraindicated and if approved by the Food and Drug Administration for that dose of the series. Providers should consult the respective Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices statement for detailed recommendations, including for high-risk conditions: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm. Clinically significant adverse events that follow immunization should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Guidance about how to obtain and complete a VAERS form is available at http://www.vaers.hhs.gov or by telephone, 800-822-7967.

1. Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB). (Minimum age: birth)

At birth:

  • Administer monovalent HepB to all newborns before hospital discharge.
  • If mother is hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, administer HepB and 0.5 mL of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) within 12 hours of birth.
  • If mother's HBsAg status is unknown, administer HepB within 12 hours of birth. Determine the HBsAg status as soon as possible and if HBsAg-positive, administer HBIG (no later than age 1 week).
  • If mother is HBsAg-negative, the birth dose should only be delayed, in rare cases, with health-care--provider's order and a copy of the mother's negative HBsAg laboratory report documented in the infant's medical record.
After the birth dose:
  • The HepB series should be completed with either monovalent HepB or a combination vaccine containing HepB. The second dose should be administered at age 1--2 months. The final dose should be administered no earlier than age 24 weeks. Infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers should be tested for HBsAg and antibody to HBsAg after completion of at least 3 doses of a licensed HepB series, at age 9--18 months (generally at the next well-child visit).
4-month dose:
  • It is permissible to administer 4 doses of HepB when combination vaccines are administered after the birth dose. If monovalent HepB is used for doses after the birth dose, a dose at age 4 months is not needed.
2. Rotavirus vaccine (Rota). (Minimum age: 6 weeks)
  • Administer the first dose at age 6--12 weeks.
  • Do not start the series later than age 12 weeks.
  • Administer the final dose in the series by age 32 weeks. Do not administer a dose later than age 32 weeks.
  • Data on safety and efficacy outside of these age ranges are insufficient.
3. Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP).
(Minimum age: 6 weeks)
  • The fourth dose of DTaP may be administered as early as age 12 months, provided 6 months have elapsed since the third dose.
  • Administer the final dose in the series at age 4--6 years.
4. Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib).
(Minimum age: 6 weeks)
  • If PRP-OMP (PedvaxHIB® or ComVax® [Merck]) is administered at ages 2 and 4 months, a dose at age 6 months is not required.
  • TriHiBit® (DTaP/Hib) combination products should not be used for primary immunization but can be used as boosters after any Hib vaccine in children aged >12 months.
5. Pneumococcal vaccine. (Minimum age: 6 weeks for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV]; 2 years for pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV])
  • Administer 1 dose of PCV to all healthy children aged 24--59 months having any incomplete schedule.
  • Administer PPV to children aged >2 years with underlying medical conditions.
6. Influenza vaccine. (Minimum age: 6 months for trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine [TIV]; 2 years for live, attenuated influenza vaccine [LAIV])
  • Administer annually to children aged 6--59 months and to all eligible close contacts of children aged 0--59 months.
  • Administer annually to children aged >5 years with certain risk factors, to other persons (including household members) in close contact with persons in groups at higher risk, and to any child whose parents request vaccination.
  • For healthy persons (i.e., those who do not have underlying medical conditions that predispose them to influenza complications) aged 2--49 years, either LAIV or TIV may be used.
  • Children receiving TIV should receive 0.25 mL if aged 6--35 months or 0.5 mL if aged >3 years.
  • Administer 2 doses (separated by >4 weeks) to children aged less than 9>
7. Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR). (Minimum age: 12 months)
  • Administer the second dose of MMR at age 4--6 years. MMR may be administered before age 4--6 years, provided >4 weeks have elapsed since the first dose.
8. Varicella vaccine. (Minimum age: 12 months)
  • Administer the second dose of varicella vaccine at age 4--6 years; may be administered >3 months after first dose.
  • Do not repeat second dose if administered >28 days after first dose.
9. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA). (Minimum age: 12 months)
  • Administer to all children aged 1 year (i.e., aged 12--23 months). Administer the 2 doses in the series at least 6 months apart.
  • Children not fully vaccinated by age 2 years can be vaccinated at subsequent visits.
  • HepA is recommended for certain other groups of children, including in areas where vaccination programs target older children.
10. Meningococcal vaccine. (Minimum age: 2 years for meningococcal conjugate vaccine [MCV4] and for meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine [MPSV4])
  • Administer MCV4 to children aged 2--10 years with terminal complement deficiencies or anatomic or functional asplenia and certain other high-risk groups. MPSV4 also is acceptable.
  • Administer MCV4 to persons who received MPSV4 >3 years previously and remain at increased risk for meningococcal disease.

The Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0--18 Years are approved by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (http://www.cdc.gov/nip/acip), the American Academy of Pediatrics (http://www.aap.org), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (http://www.aafp.org).

FIGURE 2. Recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 7--18 years --- United States, 2008 (for those who fall behind or start late, see the schedule below and the catch-up schedule [Table])


Figure 2
Return to top.

This schedule indicates the recommended ages for routine administration of currently licensed childhood vaccines, as of December 1, 2007, for children aged 7--18 years. Additional information is available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules. Any dose not administered at the recommended age should be administered at any subsequent visit, when indicated and feasible. Additional vaccines may be licensed and recommended during the year. Licensed combination vaccines may be used whenever any components of the combination are indicated and other components of the vaccine are not contraindicated and if approved by the Food and Drug Administration for that dose of the series. Providers should consult the respective Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices statement for detailed recommendations, including for high-risk conditions: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm. Clinically significant adverse events that follow immunization should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Guidance about how to obtain and complete a VAERS form is available at http://www.vaers.hhs.gov or by telephone, 800-822-7967.

1. Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap). (Minimum age: 10 years for BOOSTRIX® and 11 years for ADACEL™)
  • Administer at age 11--12 years for those who have completed the recommended childhood DTP/DTaP vaccination series and have not received a tetanus and diphtheria toxoids vaccine (Td) booster dose.
  • Adolescents aged 13--18 years who missed the 11--12 year Tdap dose or received Td only are encouraged to receive 1 dose of Tdap 5 years after the last Td/DTaP dose.
2. Human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). (Minimum age: 9 years)
  • Administer the first dose of the HPV vaccine series to females at age 11--12 years.
  • Administer the second dose 2 months after the first dose and the third dose 6 months after the first dose.
  • Administer the HPV vaccine series to females at age 13--18 years if not previously vaccinated.
3. Meningococcal vaccine.
  • Administer meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) at age 11--12 years and at age 13--18 years if not previously vaccinated. Meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MPSV4) is an acceptable alternative.
  • Administer MCV4 to previously unvaccinated college freshmen living in dormitories.
  • MCV4 is recommended for children aged 2--10 years with terminal complement deficiencies or anatomic or functional asplenia and certain other groups at high risk.
  • Persons who received MPSV4 >3 years previously and remain at increased risk for meningococcal disease should be vaccinated with MCV4.
4. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV).
  • Administer to certain groups at high risk.
5. Influenza vaccine.
  • Administer annually to all close contacts of children aged 0--59 months.
  • Administer annually to person with certain risk factors, health-care workers, and other persons (including household members) in close contact with persons in groups at higher risk.
  • Administer 2 doses (separated by >4 weeks) to children aged less than 9>
  • For healthy nonpregnant persons (i.e., those who do not have underlying medical conditions that predispose them to influenza complications) aged 2--49 years, either LAIV or TIV may be used.
6. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA).
  • Administer 2 doses in the series at least 6 months apart.
  • HepA is recommended for certain other groups of children, including in areas where vaccination programs target older children.
7. Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB).
  • Administer the 3-dose series to those who were not previously vaccinated.
  • A 2-dose series of Recombivax HB® is licensed for children aged 11--15 years.
8. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV).
  • For children who received an all-IPV or all-oral poliovirus (OPV) series, a fourth dose is not necessary if the third dose was administered at age >4 years.
  • If both OPV and IPV were administered as part of a series, a total of 4 doses should be administered, regardless of the child's current age.
9. Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR).
  • If not previously vaccinated, administer 2 doses of MMR during any visit, with >4 weeks between the doses.
10. Varicella vaccine.
  • Administer 2 doses of varicella vaccine to persons aged less than 13>>28 days after the first dose.
  • Administer 2 doses of varicella vaccine to persons aged >13 years at least 4 weeks apart.

The Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0--18 Years are approved by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (http://www.cdc.gov/nip/acip), the American Academy of Pediatrics (http://www.aap.org), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (http://www.aafp.org).

TABLE. Catch-up immunization schedule for persons aged 4 months--18 years who start late or who are >1 month behind --- United States, 2008

The table below provides catch-up schedules and minimum intervals between doses for children whose vaccinations have been delayed. A vaccine series does not need to be restarted, regardless of the time that has elapsed between doses. Use the section appropriate for the child's age.


Table
Return to top.

1. Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB).
  • Administer the 3-dose series to those who were not previously vaccinated.
  • A 2-dose series of Recombivax HB® is licensed for children aged 11--15 years.
2. Rotavirus vaccine (Rota).
  • Do not start the series later than age 12 weeks.
  • Administer the final dose in the series by age 32 weeks.
  • Do not administer a dose later than age 32 weeks.
  • Data on safety and efficacy outside of these age ranges are insufficient.
3. Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP).
  • The fifth dose is not necessary if the fourth dose was administered at age >4 years.
  • DTaP is not indicated for persons aged >7 years.
4. Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib).
  • Vaccine is not generally recommended for children aged >5 years.
  • If current age less than 12>® or ComVax® [Merck]), the third (and final) dose should be administered at age 12--15 months and at least 8 weeks after the second dose.
  • If first dose was administered at age 7--11 months, administer 2 doses separated by 4 weeks plus a booster at age 12--15 months.
5. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV).
  • Administer 1 dose of PCV to all healthy children aged 24--59 months having any incomplete schedule.
  • For children with underlying medical conditions, administer 2 doses of PCV at least 8 weeks apart if previously received less than 3>
6. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV).
  • For children who received an all-IPV or all-oral poliovirus (OPV) series, a fourth dose is not necessary if third dose was administered at age >4 years.
  • If both OPV and IPV were administered as part of a series, a total of 4 doses should be administered, regardless of the child's current age.
  • IPV is not routinely recommended for persons aged >18 years.
7. Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR).
  • The second dose of MMR is recommended routinely at age 4--6 years but may be administered earlier if desired.
  • If not previously vaccinated, administer 2 doses of MMR during any visit with >4 weeks between the doses.
8. Varicella vaccine.
  • The second dose of varicella vaccine is recommended routinely at age 4--6 years but may be administered earlier if desired.
  • Do not repeat the second dose in persons aged less than 13>>28 days after the first dose.
9. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA).
  • HepA is recommended for certain groups of children, including in areas where vaccination programs target older children. See MMWR 2006;55(No. RR-7).
10. Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids vaccine (Td) and tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap).
  • Tdap should be substituted for a single dose of Td in the primary catch-up series or as a booster if age appropriate; use Td for other doses.
  • A 5-year interval from the last Td dose is encouraged when Tdap is used as a booster dose. A booster (fourth) dose is needed if any of the previous doses were administered at age less than 2>MMWR 2006;55(No. RR-3).
11. Human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV).
  • Administer the HPV vaccine series to females at age 13--18 years if not previously vaccinated.

Information about reporting reactions after immunization is available online at http://www.vaers.hhs.gov or by telephone via the 24-hour national toll-free information line 800-822-7967. Suspected cases of vaccine-preventable diseases should be reported to the state or local health department. Additional information, including precautions and contraindications for immunization, is available from the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines or telephone, 800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636).

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Date last reviewed: 1/10/2008

Errata: Vol 57, No. 1

In "Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0--18 Years---United States, 2008," errors occurred.

On page Q-2, under Figure 1, in footnote 4, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib), the second bullet should read:

  • TriHiBit® (DTaP/Hib) combination products should not be used for primary immunization but can be used as boosters after any Hib vaccine in children aged >12 months.

On page Q-4, in the lower section of the Table titled, Catch-up schedule for persons aged 7--18 years, in row Human Papillomavirus, under column heading Dose 2 to Dose 3, the text should read:

12 weeks (and 24 weeks after the first dose)

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Date last reviewed: 3/26/2008



Sunday, June 6, 2010

NSW Government recording features for facial recognition

Face recognition

Facial recognition expers say few people realise that their features are being recorded / The Daily Telegraph

  • Government records facial features
  • Data mined nationally by police
  • Identities may be incorrect

THE New South Wales Government is quietly compiling a mathematical map of almost every adult's face, sharing information that allows law enforcement to track people by CCTV.

Experts said yesterday few people realised their facial features were being recorded in an RTA database of drivers licence photos that the Government has allowed both state and federal police to access, The Daily Telegraph reports.

The federal body CrimTrac has asked NSW for its database so it can be mined nationally by police using the facial recognition information contained in it.

University experts in facial recognition said the correct match rate was as low as 90 per cent, meaning the names of people with faces sharing a similar structure to criminals could be returned in searches.


Some airports, such as Singapore, employ facial recognition technology and the US is considering using it at border crossings.Dr Carolyn Semmler from the University of Adelaide said police wanted to eventually use facial recognition in smart CCTV cameras allowing people to be tracked anywhere there was a camera.

"Police hope that at some point an individual can be tracked," Dr Semmler said yesterday.

Professor Sowmya Arcot from the University of NSW said a "matrix of numbers" based on features and the distance between facial structures was derived using an algorithm applied to a photograph of a face.

That could then be matched to other faces stored in a database.

NSW Opposition police spokesman Mike Gallacher said most people were unaware their face had been mapped when they applied for or had their licences renewed, allowing them to potentially be tracked.

"Over 20 years ago we had a debate about the Australia card and the people of this country showed where they stood in relation to the government knowing people's movements," he said.

"The push for this into the future has far greater ramifications than some old Australia card.

"I have a concern about a lack of public debate."

The RTA began compiling its facial recognition database last December.

Roads Minister David Borger said it would be shared with other government agencies.

"While the facial recognition system is in its early stages, the RTA will co-operate with other agencies wherever possible," he said.

"The RTA already provides information to the police, and will co-operate with other state or federal law enforcement agencies."

He said the technology was also preventing fraud and stopping people obtaining multiple licences.

A spokeswoman for CrimTrac said its board of management had granted approval for a project proposal for a nation facial recognition capability.

Prepare NOW: They "Get It"

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Call for end to car rego stickers

AAP June 2, 2010,
  • A Queensland independent MP has called for the axing of car registration stickers

The Queensland Department of Transport has been plagued with problems with the registration labels over many years, with up to five million of the latest batch potentially affected by faulty glue.

Western Australia scrapped the labels for light vehicles from January 1 this year, arguing that advances in technology enabled roadside registration checks using wireless equipment and number plate recognition software.

Burnett MP Rob Messenger said a similar move in Queensland could save taxpayers millions of dollars every year.

"There is a simple solution to faulty rego stickers - do away with them altogether," Mr Messenger said.

"Registration stickers were needed in a different world when police and other public officers didn't have the ability to immediately check to see if a vehicle's registration was valid and had been paid."

The Department of Transport website lists a number of reasons for the stickers.

These include security, an aid to detecting unregistered vehicles and national uniformity.

Police union president Ian Leavers said that as an officer with 20 years' experience he found it "handy" to see registration stickers.

"They've got their place, but there's a lot of other technology which is being used in other states that could be brought into Queensland which would assist police in their duties," he said.

"If ... you don't have a computer on board and you've got to do radio checks (of registrations), just looking at a registration label assists police to say that is an out-of-date or expired registration label, then you do other checks.

"It is useful at this point in time."

Covert speed cameras a con: Qld police

AAP June 2, 2010, 2:33 pm

Queensland's police union dismisses covert speed cameras as "poker machines on wheels", but Premier Anna Bligh insists they are an important tool to help cut the state's road toll.

Police Union president Ian Leavers says Queensland's average weekly road toll has actually increased since covert cameras were introduced in early April.

"I fear that the Bligh government is becoming addicted to the revenue of speed cameras," he told reporters on Wednesday.

"Sure they rake in the dollars, however, the deterrent effect for speedsters is non-existent."

Mr Leavers said the road toll was falling before covert cameras were put on the roads.

In the 14 weeks to April 4, there were 3.7 deaths a week, while in the eight weeks to May 30 when the cameras operated there were 5.1 deaths a week.

"There is not a shred of evidence that they have had any positive impact in reducing fatalities on our roads," Mr Leavers said.

Ms Bligh said police needed a range of tools to crack down on irresponsible road use, and covert cameras were an important part of the mix.

"We know from years of experience that it's a combination of penalties, enforcement and encouraging people to do the right thing. Every part of it is important, including speed cameras.

"... I think anybody who's out there driving knows that if you know there is a red light camera, you slow down and make sure you're travelling at the speed limit.

"That is protecting lives and we are going to keep making sure it's part of a whole suite of road safety measures."

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Sacred Geometry Design Sourcebook - sample - (page 224) Star Tetrahedron Fold-up Pattern

This pattern requires 4 copies to make a finished model.





Sacred Geometry Design Sourcebook - bonus - Alternate Star Tetrahedron Fold-up Pattern

Here's another (smaller) fold-up pattern for a Star Tetrahedron. This pattern requires only 1 copy to make a finished model, but requires 2 additional cuts. It may be easier for some to put together, and has less taping and cutting than the first model.

Hint: Using one half of a slender pair of scissors carefully slid through the gaps in the almost-finished solid to apply the last 2 or 3 pieces of tape may make the final steps easier... and it DOES get easier with practice!!! :-)




The star tetrahedron is related to the merkaba shape, according to Drunvalo Melchizedek, Gregg Braden, and many others. This is also the same shape that Richard Hoagland and other researchers have found to be related to points of volcanic activity on Io (a moon of Jupiter), Mars, and many interesting points on Earth at approximately 19.5 degrees North or South Latitude (more precisely 19 degrees, 28 minutes, 16.39428 seconds) - here are a few:

  • Mauna Loa, Hawaii (19 degrees 28 minutes N, 155 degrees 37 minutes W)
  • Mexico City, Mexico (19 degrees 23 minutes N, 99 degrees 10 minutes W)
  • Dzibalchen, (Yucatan), Mexico (19 degrees 28 minutes N, 89 degrees 46 minutes W)
  • Georgetown, Grand Cayman Island (19 degrees 18 minutes N, 81 degrees 26 minutes W)
  • Mount Emi Koussi, Chad, Africa (19 degrees 47 minutes N, 18 degrees 34 minutes E)
  • Mount Kalsubai, (near Bombay), India (19 degrees 33 minutes N, 73 degrees 43 minutes E)
  • Mountain near Xiangkhoang, Laos (19 degrees 17 minutes N, 103 degrees 17 minutes E)
  • Mountain near Potosi, Bolivia (19 degrees 13 minutes S, 66 degrees 22 minutes W)
  • Yasur Volcano, Tanna Island, Vanuatu (South Pacific Ocean) (19 degrees 31 minutes S, 169 degrees 25 minutes E)
  • Mount Samuel, Northwest Territory, Australia (19 degrees 13 minutes S, 134 degrees 8 minutes E)
  • Gweru, Zimbabwe, Africa (19 degrees 31 minutes S, 29 degrees 49 minutes E)

W or E refers to West or East Longitude, N or S refers to North or South Latitude, approximations, interpolated visually from the atlas. (reference : National Geographic Atlas of the World, revised 6th edition, 1992)

SOVEREIGN INDEPENDANT ARTICLE ON EUGENICIST BARBARA HARRIS

Anti-drugs campaigner Barbara Harris brings crusade to sterilise addicts to UK

In California, Barbara Harris’s Project Prevention has been accused of back-door eugenics. Now she’s touring British cities

To many people, Barbara Harris is a dangerous woman. A maverick “do-gooder” from California, she has been accused of effectively promoting eugenics via the back door by paying for drug addicts to be sterilised.

Despite being lambasted in the media and condemned by health experts in the UK, Harris is visiting cities around Britain looking to launch pilot projects that will help her achieve her goal of reducing “the number of substance-exposed births to zero”.

While Harris may have been subjected to savage criticism from the authorities, a significant portion of the public are warming to her views.

The website of Harris’s charity, Project Prevention, boasts scores of emails from Britons supportive of her aims, many of whom have pledged donations while expressing anger that the government will not introduce a similar scheme of its own. Typical comments read: “I had to deal with this issue as a teacher and it enraged me. I hope you are successful in the UK and not defeated by the liberal urban elite who seem to dominate our country with their wishy-washy half-hearted solutions to our deep social problems. I have made a donation.”

Another, from a child protection solicitor for a county council, adds: “All I want to say to you is thank god for project prevention! Congratulations on coming to the UK. I get tired of hearing about drug addicts’ rights while children suffer”¦ I hope to see the success of this project in my everyday work.”

Harris has talked up her growing UK support base on Twitter, although backing for her ideals is by no means uniform. Many of the comments on the site and other social networking online platforms are hostile. Some experts are reluctant to condemn Harris outright.

“The problem that Ms Harris is trying to address is a real one,” concedes Julian Sheather, the British Medical Association’s ethics manager, writing in a personal capacity on the British Medical Journal’s blog.

“A small number of drug-addicted women give birth to a succession of drug-dependent children who are taken into foster care. It is by any standards an appalling start in life.

“There is a certain red-necked ‘it does what it says on the can’ appeal to Ms Harris’s response. Her championing the rights of the unborn over the rights of addict mothers also has a certain populist appeal.”

However, Sheather warns, Harris’s actions raise serious ethical issues. “Even Project Prevention admits the money will almost always go to feed the addict’s habit,” he notes.

“Would the addiction render consent invalid? Is the payment a coercive means of getting people to agree to a sterilisation they would otherwise not contemplate?”

Since it was founded in 1994, Project Prevention has paid 3,388 people in the US to be sterilised or to take long-term contraception measures. Of these, 1,059 have chosen Depo-Provera, a long-term injectable contraceptive; 1,260 chose tubal ligation — sterilisation — while the remainder have opted for coils or implants. Just under 50 men have had vasectomies.

In the US, addicts are offered up to $300 (£200) for sterilisation. The charity states its objective is “to reduce the burden of this social problem on taxpayers, trim down social worker caseloads, and alleviate from our clients the burden of having children that will potentially be taken away.”

Felicia Le May, a former crystal meth addict who opted for sterilisation after having nine children, told the Sun: “At first I was scared, but then I thought, ‘I have too many kids already.’

“They’ve suffered so much through having both parents addicted. I had my children taken away for two years because of my meth addiction. That was the worst time of my life. I didn’t want to risk putting any more babies through the same thing.”

Her story is typical of those who have sought help from Project Prevention, which was founded by Harris after she adopted four of eight children born to a Los Angeles addict. Harris said that she decided to take action after spending “countless hours watching her children fight through withdrawal”.

There have been accusations the charity focuses disproportionately on black people.

It insists it “targets a behaviour, not a racial demographic”. Since she arrived in the UK earlier this month there have been reports that a woman was approached near a health centre in Glasgow by three women from Project Prevention who offered her £200 if she agreed to be sterilised. The woman was with her nine-year-old son and was not a drug addict.

However, Harris told the Observer in an email that the story was untrue. “We never approach people on the street,” she said, adding: “We never assume someone is an addict, no matter where we go. We approach people asking if they know any drug addicts they can give our info to.”

The controversy generated by her visit to the UK this month has focused attention on the risks to children of drug addicts. It is reported that one out of every 264 babies born in Scotland suffers withdrawal symptoms from mothers who use drugs including heroin and cannabis.

In a sign that she is serious about bringing her vision to the UK, Harris confirmed that she is seeking UK charitable status, though there are questions over whether the Charity Commission will approve this given the group’s controversial aims. Harris also confirmed she is considering several cities in the UK for potential pilot projects, although she has yet to decide whether she will proceed.

Martin Barnes, chief executive of DrugScope, an independent organisation that examines drug issues, accused Project Prevention of applying what could be “a simplistic, moralistic and exploitative approach to addressing the difficult and complex issue of drug use and pregnancy”.

He added: “The welfare of children is paramount, but using cash incentives to often poor and vulnerable women is highly questionable. For many women with drug problems, the chance to become a mother can be life-changing and a powerful motivation to seek help for their addiction and other problems in their lives.”

He warned that legitimising Project Prevention could have significant repercussions. “Where should the line be drawn? Women who drink? Women who smoke? Women with mental health problems? Women who themselves have been the victim of abuse?”

Short URL: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=4367

Donate winter warmth to Lost Dogs' Home

Lost Dogs' Home

Blanket drive: The Lost Dogs' Home needs your donations. Picture: David Caird Source: Herald Sun

MYA may look naturally warm and cuddly, but the nine-week-old Australian shepherd needs a good blanket just as much as the next dog.

The Lost Dogs' Home is calling for people to donate their used blankets and towels - to keep all of its canines warm this winter - as part of its annual drive starting today.

In what is, unfortunately, a peak period for abandoning pets, many dogs are left out in the cold during winter until taken to lost dogs' shelters.

The public donations of blankets, towels, soft dog beds and coats keep thousands of dogs warm and this year a special call has been made for woolly blankets.

Yesterday Mya posed at Eltham Veterinary Practice, which is holding an annual blanket drive to assist the Lost Dogs' Home, alongside the Cat Protection Society in Greensborough, for the fourth consecutive year.

The North Melbourne, Cranbourne, Moss Vale and Echuca lost dogs' depots are the main points for donating blankets and towels this morning.