This is a post I put on the Herald Sun website, in response to one of Andrew Bolt’s opinion pieces. I will be very interested to see if the Herald Sun follows through and publishes this contention. They will look decidedly hypocritical if they don’t.
“"Defend free speech."
THIS is hilarious coming from Andrew.
HIS EMPLOYERS do not defend, or value 'free speech', unless it calibrates with their own personal opinions.
This may well prove to be an inside job-like Bali, and 9/11 was.
Was this a tactic for Chairman Rudd to rush some new anti-Australian, oops, I meant anti-terrorist, legislation through parliament?
Or, an opportunity to capitalise on existing un-Australian legislation that Howard the Coward rushed through after possible collaboration on 9/11 and Bali.
Yet, here is Andrew defending the right to utilise free speech.
We will find out soon enough, if Andrew and the HS, believe, that freedom of speech actually means accommodating an opinion that is diametrically opposed to your own, and that it also, means, allowing that idea to be promulgated freely in the community.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
the mikiverse loves free speech and wholeheartedley accepts, that someone who is diametrically opposed to my views is free to promulgate those thoughts...However, misogyny, racism, intolerance etc will see that comment deleted.
These abstract considerations will be solely, and exclusively determined by the mikiverse, so play hard, but, nice.