UNTESTED SWINE FLU ‘VACCINATION’ BEING OFFERED TO INFANTS UNDER 3

WILL YOUR CHILD BE NEXT?? WILL CHAIRMAN RUDD FORCE AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN TO BE 'VACCINATED'? CAN YOU PROTECT YOUR CHILD FROM THIS SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT? IS THIS EUGENICS IN DISGUISE?

READ THE ORIGINAL DAILY MAIL ARTICLE HERE.

"The vaccines are undergoing a fast-track testing process, with trials in England and Europe. However, safety trials will not involve any children under three, despite babies and toddlers with underlying health problems being first in the queue for jabs."

Isn't it interesting that there is a fast tracking process, but inadequate testing procedures, Is this a case of wanting to appear to be doing something, whilst actually doing as little as possible?

"The European Medicines Agency is expected to license vaccines being developed by the GSK and Baxter companies in late September or early October, days before the vaccination programme is due to commence in the UK"

Does this constitute proof that the European Union-and the self interested European Union Agencies-have little or no care for the welfare of individual nation states? How much does it cost multi-national corporations to 'convince' Agencies to license a vaccine before it has been tested in an area?

"Professor David Salisbury, the Government's director of immunisation, said it was vital that at-risk groups should be protected as soon as possible. He claimed the benefit of giving it to under-threes was 'strong' because young children in at-risk groups had serious conditions which would be made 'much worse' if they got the flu."

Precisely which human beings would benefit, or remain in the same condition if they got the flu? Why is he stating the obvious? Is this because there is actually no reason to introduce vaccinations? Is this another case of an employee of a self-interested-Government-agency putting the agency needs ahead of the public they are serving? What would happen to his job, if we closed this largely irrelevant self-serving-agency down?

Dr Steve Field, chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners, said he did not have concerns about the lack of testing in young children. 'If I'm faced by a parent with a child under three who has serious underlying health problems, I don't think there is a dilemma because swine flu could be a serious threat to the child. 'I have spoken to the Chief Medical Officer and I do not believe he would do anything to compromise the safety of any patient. I would give the jabs to my children.'

How seriously, should we be taking the word of a man, who accepts a superior's word ahead of no infant testing whatsoever? Would he really give 'the jabs' to his children?

But Dr Halvorsen, author of The Truth About Vaccines, questioned whether sufficient testing would have been completed before Britons were asked to have the jabs in a two-stage process. He said: 'The testing is being rushed through faster than any vaccine testing programme in history, yet it's not long enough to really see whether it's safe and effective.

Why the haste? Are the lives of innocent people being put at risk because multi-national companies want to increase their profits? Is the corporation known as "GREAT BRITAIN", or "ENGLAND", involved in a financial relationship with either, or both multi-national companies? Does the aforementioned corporation own stock in these multi-national companies? Would the English government/agency intentionally endanger the life of children for profit?

"'Do we really need a mass vaccination programme for an illness which is relatively mild in most people and has caused fewer deaths than seasonal flu?'"

Is this the REAL reason why Dr. Field is so apparently willing to 'give a jab' to his own children? If the illness is less harmful than the common cold, then why the push for a mass vaccination programme? What does the government really want?

The National Flu Pandemic Service is being dramatically scaled back for the time being as the number of cases recedes. But Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson said a second surge was expected in the autumn and it was vital to vaccinate the vulnerable."

Why is it so vital to mass vaccinate the public if this swine flu is safer than the common cold? WHY ARE THE EOROPEAN UNION USING INFANTS AND THE 'VULNERABLE' AS A SMOKE SCREEN? IS THIS A SALAMI SLICE TACTIC?

IS THIS A PART OF THE UNITED NATION PLAN FOR A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT?

SHOULD THIS SERVE AS A WARNING TO CANADIAN'S AMERICAN'S AND MEXICAN'S AGAINST FORMING A NORTH AMERICAN UNION?

Feel free to place a comment on this important issue.

Do YOU know something that the public needs to know about? Do you work for one of these agencies and you want to come clean? The Mikiverse is looking for anonymous testimony from anyone with direct knowledge of this most disturbing situation, as well as any of the other disturbing vaccination situations.